What for? The applicant had to navigate through every page of Microsoft`s agreement that required him to click “I agree” before it continued on each page. In short, they had the opportunity to read the conditions before they were adopted and to apply them to the conditions set by Microsoft. However, in Hubbert v. Dell Corp. (2005), the Tribunal abandoned browsewrap. In addition, the Southwest Airlines Court v. BoardFirst found that BoardFirst was aware of Southwest`s terms, as Southwest BoardFirst sent a letter of omission. As a result, Browsewrap`s agreement alone would probably not have been sufficient to succeed. If changes occur with an agreement, even small ones, finally, notify each existing user of the changes you make to that contract. Browsewrap agreements have the inherent protection that repeated use or interaction with a site indicates a certain degree of knowledge of existence and therefore attention. Zoocasa`s search engine allegedly used the information from the Century 21 website for Zoocasa`s monetary advantage, which was contrary to the legal agreement of the Century 21 site.